Quantized Inertia

It's amazing that somehow we all bought into the idea that gravity pulls from the inside, rather than pushes from the cosmic horizon. 

Like how did we go "hmm we have this gravity force that, when it hits you, applies a *negative* momentum" "It hits you and as a result of being hit you fall toward the force carrier that hit you" . It should be totally counter intuitive and yet it's what we all believe.

I think we're all so used to physics being counterintuitive that we almost reject theories that make sense out of hand.

I think it's all those gravity analogies that we grew up on. The images that depict a 2d sheet and a big ball in the center and little balls falling into it.

It wrecked our intuition about the universe.

Guys, what if gravity force carriers actually do what other force carriers do, and PUSH you when they hit you. What if they are coming from outside, rather than inside. 

What if the reason you fall toward the center of a large mass, is that that large mass is casting a shadow on you, neutralizing an opposing push. The denser the mass, the deeper the shadow, and the greater the force imbalance. 

How does gravity escape the event horizon of a black hole?  Maybe it was never there to begin with. Maybe you are being pushed into the black hole, rather than pulled. Maybe the black hole is just a really good filter for an opposing push. That makes way more sense. But it's "pseudoscience" right?  Can't be. Physics wouldn't make sense.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYdebV9YlnI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnNKC82wUmY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRcmqZkGOK4

Counter Theories ( MOND ) Which seem like utter BS because of tall the hacks and contextualized modifications they have to make. ( NOTE I Love PBS Spacetime, I'm only ragging on MOND ) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sTBZ2G4vow

( If universe is x, then mond is a, else if universe is y, it's b, else ..etc

Don't raise this in the physics stack exchange though. They'll run you out for heresy. The problem is that Mike McCulloch , is also trying to use this for propulsion. Maybe that's possible, maybe not, but I fear that this is causing other aspects of his theory that seem very self consistent, with high prediction power, to be overlooked and written off. Which means we probably have to wait 50 years for someone else to propose the same thing, in order for it to be taken seriously.