The UFO and UAP Acronyms are Gaslights

There is evidence that sounds or colors that we do not learn to distinguish early, we may struggle to distinguish later on in life.

It's critical to have a word or at least a use, for a distinct classification, to be able to learn it.

The brain is a pattern recognizing machine. It classifies things and needs re-enforcement to retain distinct classifications. It needs to have a reason to not simply lump two similar things in the same exact conceptual bucket.

The problem with UFO ( and perhaps more so, UAP ) is that it does not allow us to mentally distinguish between entities which "likely" have a prosaic explanation, form those that almost certainly do not.

For example this McMinnville photograph: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McMinnville_UFO_photographs 

"Maccabee analyzed the photos and concluded that the photographs were not hoaxed and showed a "real, physical" object in the sky above the Trent farm.^[11] Much of his analysis is based on densitometric measurements, similar to the photometric analysis done by Hartmann. Maccabee argued that the brightness of the object's underside suggested it was at some distance from the camera, not a smaller object close to it.^[12]"

It may be "unidentified" but It's also clearly non prosaic. It's non human, non animal, non atmospheric. It is a structured craft with no other known candidate as a source of manufacture, other than non human. Now maybe back then, you could argue it was "Possibly Russian", but even then I think an acronym of "almost certainly non human" would have been a valid way to classify the craft.

And yet this remarkable photo, gets put in the same bucket, as sightings of Venus or swamp gas. And suddenly the brain sees nothing out of the ordinary. As a result, the public mind simply doesn't distinguish between them.

This incredible stroke of genius on part of the NHI cover up, is that they can openly acknowledge that something is a UFO, and the public immediately lumps it in to the generic UFO bucket with all the other junk and forgets about it as unimportant.

A massive disc could hover over a major city or airport for hours, be sighted by thousands of people over the course of the day, be flagged as a "UFO" and the public will almost certainly forget about it over time. They begin to question their own memory. It wasn't an alien craft it was a "UFO". Therefore not important, likely misremembered, and worth forgetting.

Gaslit....

If we want disclosure, then the first thing we need to fix , is to STOP USING the UFO or UAP acronym as government wants us to. Please stop playing their game when it comes to this. We need to demand that they classify these craft as what they are and frankly they need to go back and retroactively re-classify historic photos as what they are. "LIKELY NON HUMAN"

I propose we define two new buckets for what currently occupies the UFO mind space.

We need something akin to Non Human Craft. or Non Human Structure, for cases where it's clearly a structure, and it's apparently non human in origin. My only concern here is we may need to indicate that it is "likely non human" or "apparently non human", but yeah something to that effect. Maybe "Apparent Alien Craft" or similar.

And then something like Prosaic Aerial Stuff.

There's a great "Why Files" on the the need to have a use for distinct color, to perceive it. I'm not sure this is the best example, but it's a recent example that comes to mind. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=totDkXxKOXg. I think sounds in language may be a better example. Learning a foreign language at an older age can be difficult because you lose the ability to distinguish between two sounds that up until that point, it wasn't necessary for you to be able to distinguish.

Anyhow, let's do our selves a favor and start tagging anything that is clearly a craft, that is almost certainly non human, with an acronym other than UAP or UFO and refuse to use those classifications for any such craft.

#NonHumanCraft