Splayed Rants

I propose to the #CDC @CDCgov  or whoever would be in charge, that we not evaluate infectious disease responses in terms deaths prevented, but rather in terms of YEARS of life saved.  This makes the risk/reward easier to quantify.  If the disease is costing us an average of 10 years of life for .002% of the population, then maybe it's not worth asking 100% of the population to stay in their homes for 2 years.  The net negative impact to humanity is actually greater for the preventative action.  Additionally, if the risk/reward is properly quantified, we don't have to force anyone to do anything and we shouldn't do this.  We can simply give them the numbers, and let them make up their minds as to the risk they want to take. We could rate disease in terms of years of life lost, years of life that are potentially salvageable through actions, years of life impacted by actions taken and severity of actions required as a multiplier on those years.  If severi...

One concept that enslaved us during the #COVID pandemic, was that if you didn't wear a mask, you may be, however indirectly, responsible for someone's death.  This was an argument that was difficult to contend with.  But we MUST contend with it, because it's flawed.  Failure to sacrifice ALWAYS has this outcome, and importantly, every single day of your life, there are sacrifices not taken.  * How many hours did you work in a homeless shelter or domestic violence shelter this week? How many more could you have worked? * How much time did you spend investigating an unsolved crime or volunteering at a neighborhood watch? * How much money you spend donating to life saving charities?  * How much time did you spend volunteering to build up infrastructure in 3rd world countries? Even if the answer to any of those or an infinite number of similar bullet points, is greater than zero, it's always going to be less than it could have been.  And when you add up the def...

  Regarding this Context Note:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0igRLrKw3HY Google judges what is accurate and what is inaccurate based on what the mainstream believes in the present. They then re-enforce that narrative, by "fact checking" only the content that disagrees with the mainstream assessment at the time. Even when their "context" note is failing to incorporate all of the data in its assertion. This creates an issue where, if the mainstream understanding is wrong, then change, acceptance, learning and growth are impeded by Google’s actions.  If you want to put this "Context" note here on “alien abduction”, which btw isn't even the primary focus of the video, then please also link to the congressional testimony where 3 credible witnesses testified before congress that non-human craft are operating in our airspace. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcrCMLVk614 Their testimony is corroborated by radar and  camera data. This is very high sigma, obje...

Anti Gravity Beginners Guide and Home Experimentation Kit:   Sound based levitation using standing sound waves, is the SAME as gravitational wave based levitation from a conceptual standpoint. Both use manipulation of longitudinal or compressive waves via any kind of reflector. This can be done in water as well. Spacetime compression waves ( i.e. “Gravitational Waves” Which have been observed and so are proven )  are rippling all through the universe. In concept, we already have this technology. An example is “standing wave acoustic levitation” https://youtube.com/watch?v=XpNbyfxxkWE.. It’s used to create standing compressive or “longitudinal” waves in the air known as “sound” which can then be used to levitate objects that are free floating within this “air” medium. Some theories say this technology was used to build the Pyramids. But frankly, if you can do this with air, you can do it with spacetime, and the latter will likely be more potent. The exact same math, should...

During #COVID We created the toxic extreme of virtue, where your personal sacrifice is demanded for the greater public “good”, to a fault.  To the point where no one is strong enough to stand up for themselves and their personal beliefs.  Sacrifice must be balanced with selfishness. BOTH are needed, in balance, for a free society to exist. BOTH, taken to an extreme, bring about great suffering. Blood is better than slavery. Because in the end, slavery always brings more blood.  Sacrificing all of oneself for any amount of spared blood, will lead to slavery. We all need to be free to assess how much we will sacrifice at a given time, for a given cause. And importantly, any and ALL non action results in blood loss.  Declining to wear a mask is no different than not taking a few hours out of your day to work with a drug addict or the homeless, or the abused. It’s a sacrifice not taken that will absolutely result in death.  Every day we, through our inaction, cause ...