Splayed Rants

 @PBSSpaceTime   "It's never aliens until it is".  This creates "a bridge too far", as we are never allowed to step onto the path of discovery, until we have already arrived at the destination. There is no other domain where such prohibition of reason exists. #NonHumanCraft #UFO This also has the effect of "zeroing out" any kind of signal of Non Human Intelligence, preventing such signal from accumulating into a meaningful proof.  It may be that you have 10 different indicators hinting at contact, but if none of them are allowed to count for anything on their own, then the aggregate signal is still zero. For example say you are out at sea and in the distance you think you see a bird.    You can point to the evidence that something airborne is moving.    But it's "NEVER" a bird until it is so  you rule out that evidence.    Then you can point to the evidence that you hear a bird sound.  But it's "NEVER" a bird until it is so ...

There is evidence that sounds or colors that we do not learn to distinguish early, we may struggle to distinguish later on in life. It's critical to have a word or at least a use, for a distinct classification, to be able to learn it. The brain is a pattern recognizing machine. It classifies things and needs re-enforcement to retain distinct classifications. It needs to have a reason to not simply lump two similar things in the same exact conceptual bucket. The problem with UFO ( and perhaps more so, UAP ) is that it does not allow us to mentally distinguish between entities which "likely" have a prosaic explanation, form those that almost certainly do not. For example this McMinnville photograph: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McMinnville_UFO_photographs  " Maccabee analyzed the photos and concluded that the photographs were not hoaxed and showed a "real, physical" object in the sky above the Trent farm. [11]  Much of his analysis is based on densitometric ...

The source of all life is change. The universe exists because there is difference. Math describes the universe because math describes difference.  At a fundamental level, the universe is zero and one. Energy is Information Delta.  Therefore the answer to the meaning of life is simple.  Why does life exist?  To change.

Fear is not necessarily the concept of "aliens". Fear is the unknown. The uncertainty of what this means for us. Therefore the only viable pathway to disclosure needs to address this uncertainty right out the gate. Aliens can then be an after thought. The number one thing you have to address for people off the bat is this. "How can I feel safe?" No one can guarantee your safety, even without aliens, but people need to have a certain minimum threshold of probability that they will be safe in order to cope and function. Or at least tell them what measures they can take to improve their level of safety. The problem with Aliens is it completely eliminates our mental "framework" of safety. Personal: Can they fly over my house? Can they bypass security? If discovered , can I fend them off? Can the police? National: Can they bypass military security? Can they violate airspace? Do they have any fear whatsoever of retaliation? Do we have anyway to at least slow an ...

  Shame is used to manipulate people.  You can take someone who cares about what others think, and cause them to deny their own needs for their own emotional and mental being through shame. I think we need to strengthen the populations ability to endure in the face of shame. We need to be able to take actions that will bring us shame.  You need to be able to put yourself out there and be wrong. Because only through that act of bravery in the face of shame, can we grow. Also, sometimes the majority gets things wrong. If no one is willing to speak against the majority, then we may not know that the majority is wrong until many have suffered. It's important for people to challenge the majority, regardless of who seems most likely to be "right". Shame holds us back. Shame prevents disclosure of challenges that one may need help in overcoming.  Shame enables those who would do harm. Shame is one of the fundamental elements of all that is wrong.

If the electric repulsive energy amount defining a coulomb barrier confines ( and diverts ) quantum energies and in so doing, couples us to the field of gravity’s flow emerging as mass, then we may be able to create what I'm just going to call a “coulomb funnel” that directs this flow away from us, masking our total inner “flow exposed” surface area. We need to generate the type of energies we use to overcome the coulomb barrier, and then stabilize ( to some degree ) an array of that energy density, and arrange it, into the perimeter of a funnel, diverting flow from the outer extent of our craft through empty space. That’s all :) It may not need to be that much energy, if we are just trying to nudge, influence or guide the flow. Like the soft squishy, saturated, muddy embankment of a river flowing along soft soil, more than the hard barrier of a metal water pipe. Except even softer perhaps. These are the levels of EM energies that can separate the quantum energies of what’s inside ...

It's "Easy" to Keep a Population Ignorant of Anti Gravity We're in a "false valley" from a learning perspective. We have to unlearn what we've learned to get to where we need to be to build these ships.  It's easy to keep a learning algorithm (Human Mind) in a false valley. Just keep re-enforcing it. "Your people could build one of these now if they wanted to"   - Allan Lavigne https://youtu.be/VgDj1k0D0m0?t=3550 I wouldn't be surprised if our govt has unlocked anti gravity, and is intentionally keeping us in this false valley. All it would take is a few falsified published studies that were intentionally set up to fail, proving " no thrust" or something similar. If enough studies are already done, no one else does them. "Why waste the time? The study has already been done. It didn't work" Then seize a few patent applications every few years. The tech stays safely locked in the hands of a few.   My understanding ...

I think there is actually plenty of proof. I think the issue is more that there is no "trusted" proof. There is no proof that is being presented either by someone we trust a lot, or by a large number of people that we trust a good deal. There are a lot of high quality photos that clearly illustrate craft with capacities way beyond human capability. And there are instances that are corroborated by multiple credible witnesses and sensors. These (the craft) are not ours ( at least not within the realm of publicly known science ). They are too fast. And they show up on many sensors, and are seen by many credible witnesses swearing this under oath. These are real and they are too advanced to be ours. Again there is proof for anyone who is willing to consider the reality of those statements for what they are. I think the issue is not that we are lacking evidence, it's that we are lacking someone we trust, to vouch for that evidence as being authentic and significant. We are loo...